On Wednesday, June 1, American actor Johnny Depp gained his defamation trial towards his former spouse Amber Heard, with Heard additionally shedding the vast majority of her countersuit. Watched by hundreds of thousands, the televised court docket battle is among the most well-known defamation circumstances of all time, with the hashtag #justiceforjohnnydepp receiving round 19 billion views on TikTok. However what’s the story behind the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard trial? And what different excessive profile defamation trials have prompted a stir in recent times?
Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard
After marrying at a personal ceremony in 2015, Johnny Depp and Amber Heard break up the next yr. Two years later, in 2018, Heard wrote an op-ed for The Washington Submit during which she described her expertise of home violence, although didn’t point out Depp’s identify.
“I turned a public determine representing home abuse, and I felt the total power of our tradition’s wrath for ladies who communicate out,” Heard wrote. “We have now a gap now to bolster and construct establishments protecting of ladies. For starters, Congress can reauthorise and strengthen the Violence Towards Ladies Act.”
Following the publication of Heard’s op-ed, Depp sued Heard for defamation, looking for $50 million in damages. Depp claimed Heard was not the sufferer of home abuse, however as a substitute the perpetrator, although 2020 noticed Depp lose a UK libel lawsuit towards the Solar over an article during which the British tabloid known as him a “wife-beater.”
In 2021, Heard countersued for $100 million, claiming that she was solely ever violent towards Depp in defence of herself or her sister. The countersuit centred on three feedback that Depp’s former lawyer Adam Waldman made to the Each day Mail in 2020, during which he known as Heard’s allegations of abuse a “hoax.”
On April 11 2022, the Depp vs Heard defamation trial started, with each Heard and Depp showing in court docket in Fairfax County, Virginia. Depp’s attorneys labored to deconstruct Heard’s claims of abuse, whereas Heard’s attorneys targeted on Depp’s previous drug and alcohol use, in addition to textual content messages and recordings, claiming Depp was violent towards his ex-wife.
A number of weeks later, on June 1, the jury unanimously discovered that Heard couldn’t show her claims towards her former husband and that she knew her claims of abuse had been false when she revealed her op-ed in 2018. Depp was awarded $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages.
The jury additionally dominated that Depp, by way of his former lawyer, defamed Heard on one rely and Heard was awarded $2 million in compensatory damages, although nothing in punitive damages.
“From the very starting, the purpose of bringing this case was to disclose the reality, whatever the end result,” Depp stated in an announcement.
“Talking the reality was one thing that I owed to my youngsters and to all those that have remained steadfast of their assist of me. I really feel at peace figuring out I’ve lastly completed that.”
JK Rowling vs Each day Mail
In 2014, JK Rowling sued British newspaper the Each day Mail for publishing an article claiming the Harry Potter writer was mendacity a couple of story she had instructed in an article for the one mother and father’ charity, Gingerbread.
Within the article, Rowling revealed her expertise of being stigmatised by members of her church for being a single mom. Quickly after the article was revealed, the Each day Mail launched a bit suggesting the writer had made false claims towards the church members, titled “How JK’s sob story about her single mom’s previous shocked and confused the church members who cared for her.”
When Rowling sued the Each day Mail for libel, it was pressured to pay her “substantial damages” and was required to subject a public apology:
“Our September 28, 2013 article ‘How JK’s sob story about her single mom previous shocked and confused the church members who cared for her’ recommended that JK Rowling made a knowingly false and inexcusable declare in an article for the Gingerbread charity that folks at her church had stigmatised her and cruelly taunted her for being a single mom,” the Each day Mail wrote.
“In reality, Mrs Rowling recounted just one incident the place a customer to the church stigmatised and taunted her on a selected day. We settle for that Ms Rowling’s article didn’t include any false claims and apologise for any opposite suggestion and have agreed to pay substantial damages to Ms Rowling, which she is donating to charity, and a contribution to her authorized prices.”
Brangelina vs Information Of The World
In 2010, American actors and then-husband and spouse Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie filed a grievance following a sequence of articles in Information Corp’s magazines, claiming the couple had been divorcing. The publication printed a front-page story on the couple and went so far as to recommend that they’d already met with divorce attorneys to start thrashing out a deal to divide their belongings of £205 million.
Pitt and Jolie introduced their libel motion by way of London attorneys Shillings towards Information Group Newspapers, the Information Worldwide subsidiary that publishes the Information of the World.
After the courts dominated in favour of the movie star couple, Information Corp admitted that its tales had been primarily based on falsehood and agreed to pay an unrevealed sum of cash in damages and authorized charges to a charity of the couple’s alternative.
“When the Information of the World didn’t publicly retract the allegations and apologise for them – thereby leaving their readers in the dead of night as to the true place – the couple felt they’d no various than to sue,” Schillings commented post-trial.
“At present’s victory marks the top of the litigation introduced by Brad and Angelina.”